Ad verba per numeros
Sunday, May 8, 2011, 04:10 PM
One of the topics raised during those discussions was the "influence" or "impact" of users in online social networks. In fact, one of the proposed exercises consisted of studying, implementing, and analysing the so-called velocity-acceleration method by Organic, Inc. ([1] and [2]).
Thus, the discussion revolved around what "influence" really is, measures for the different interpretations of influence (if any), and algorithms to compute them.
Needless to say, different perceptions for influence arose:
- get other people to accept your ideas and spread them (e.g. getting retweets in Twitter or Likes in Facebook);
- get people to consume your contents or the contents you promote (e.g. getting people to click in the URLs you publish);
- or get people to behave in a certain way in real world (e.g. buying a product, attending a concert or voting a given candidate).
With regards to algorithms to compute one or another measure of "influence" or "impact" there are a number of them for Twitter and other online social networks, such as:
- E. Bakshy et al. "Identifying 'Influencers' on Twitter," Proceedings of the fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2011.
- D. Gayo-Avello. Nepotistic Relationships in Twitter and their Impact on Rank Prestige Algorithms. Arxiv preprint. arXiv:1004.0816, 2010.
- D. Gayo-Avello et al. De retibus socialibus et legibus momenti. EPL vol. 94 no. 3, 2011.
- C. Lee et al. "Finding Influentials from Temporal Order of Information Adoption in Twitter," Proceedings of 19th World-Wide Web (WWW) Conference (Poster), 2010.
- A. Pal & S. Counts. "Identifying Topical Authorities in Microblogs," Proceedings of the fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2011.
- D.M. Romero et al. Influence and Passivity in Social Media. Arxiv preprint. arXiv:1008.1253v1, 2010.
- D. Tunkelang. A Twitter Analog to PageRank. Blog post, 2009.
- J. Weng et al. "TwitterRank: Finding Topic-sensitive Influential Twitterers," Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2010, pp. 261270.
- J.M. Kleinberg, "Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment", Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, 1998, pp. 668677.
- M.G. Noll et al. Telling Experts from Spammers: Expertise Ranking in Folksonomies. Proceedings of 32nd ACM SIGIR Conference, Boston, USA, July 2009, pp. 612-619.
- L. Page et al. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web, 1998.
First, influence is an elusive concept so you'll need to determine the kind of impact you're interested in and the way to measure it.
Second, there can exist an algorithmic way to compute a proxy measure for your "flavor" of influence so give a try to previous methods before going after a new silver bullet.
As usual, if you want to add something to the discussion just e-mail me or contat me at Twitter (@PFCdgayo).
Back Next